[Oct-2026] Free NCP-MCI-7.5 Exam Dumps to Improve Exam Score [Q60-Q76]

[Oct-2026] Free NCP-MCI-7.5 Exam Dumps to Improve Exam Score [Q60-Q76]

October 7, 2026 latestexam 0 Comments

Rate this post

[Oct-2026] Free NCP-MCI-7.5 Exam Dumps to Improve Exam Score

2026 Realistic NCP-MCI-7.5 Dumps Exam Tips Test Pdf Exam Material

Nutanix NCP-MCI-7.5 Exam Syllabus Topics:

Section	Objectives
Networking and Security	– Microsegmentation and security policies – Network configuration in AHV – Virtual networking concepts
Prism Administration and Management	– Prism Element and Prism Central – Reporting and analytics – Monitoring and alerts
Virtualization and AHV	– AHV architecture and features – VM lifecycle management – Image service and VM deployment
Storage and Data Services	– Storage containers and policies – Data resiliency and replication – Snapshots and backups
Cluster Operations and Lifecycle Management	– Health monitoring and troubleshooting – Capacity planning and optimization – Upgrades and lifecycle management
Nutanix Architecture and Core Concepts	– Cluster design fundamentals – Hyperconverged Infrastructure (HCI) principles – Nutanix AOS components and architecture

NEW QUESTION 60
An administrator has been tasked to remove a node from a Nutanix cluster running SQL VMs to help with a hardware refresh. After the node removal started, the administrator received the following error:
Node node_uuid cannot be removed: Cluster needs at least 5 usable nodes.
What action does the administrator need complete to remove the node?

Add the replacement node to the cluster first and then remove the original node.

Change the cluster Replication Factor (RF) to RF2 and then remove the node.

Change the storage containers Replication Factor (RF) to RF2 and remove the node.

Shutdown the CVM and use ncli to force the removal of the node.

The error message is tied to resilience requirements. Nutanix documentation states that Replication Factor 3 requires at least five nodes so data remains online even if two nodes fail concurrently. If removing a node would drop the cluster below the minimum usable-node requirement, Nutanix blocks the operation. The safest and supported way to proceed during a hardware refresh is to add the replacement node first, restore compliant cluster capacity, and then remove the original node. ( Nutanix Portal ) The wrong answers all involve bypassing or weakening resilience inappropriately. Changing cluster or container RF to RF2 just to remove a node would reduce fault tolerance and is not the right answer for a SQL environment where resilience matters. Force-removal is also not the supported operational answer in a healthy refresh workflow. This question tests whether the administrator understands that node lifecycle actions are constrained by Nutanix fault-tolerance rules. When the cluster says it needs at least five usable nodes, the correct action is not to override the rule but to satisfy it by adding capacity first. Therefore A is the correct answer. ( Nutanix Portal )

NEW QUESTION 61
An administrator is migrating from a standalone ESXi host and needs to provide access to an AHV storage container.
How should the administrator complete this task?

Setup the AHV storage container as an NFS share.

Import the ESXi host to the AHV cluster.

Create user for authentication to NFS access.

Add the ESXi host IP to Filesystem Whitelist.

Nutanix documentation and KB guidance for transferring virtual disks to AHV clearly state that when a source hypervisor such as ESXi needs temporary access to a Nutanix storage container, administrators should add the host IP address to the filesystem whitelist. That is the approved mechanism for allowing the source host to mount or access the container for migration purposes. This makes D the correct answer. ( portal.
nutanix.com , portal.nutanix.com , portal.nutanix.com )
The wording “setup as an NFS share” is too generic and is not the exact Nutanix administrative step. Nutanix storage containers are not meant to be treated as open general-purpose file shares. Importing the ESXi host into AHV is not the workflow here, and per-user NFS authentication is not the key control being tested. The precise and supported action is to allow the ESXi host through the Filesystem Whitelist.

NEW QUESTION 62
A VM is protected by a protection policy and the volume group is configured with CHAP authentication. An administrator rotates the VM’s password as part of the monthly routine. What action must the administrator perform to ensure the password is retained in the event of a failover?

Update the associated recovery plan.

Set the password as part of startup policy.

Update the associated protection policy.

Set the password in the VG recovery points.

For CHAP-protected volume groups, Nutanix documentation is explicit that when the target password is changed, the administrator must also update the associated recovery plan. Nutanix states that if the new target password is not updated in the recovery plan, it is not retained after failover. That makes the recovery plan the place where the failover-side credential continuity is preserved. In other words, protection policies create and replicate recovery points, but the recovery plan contains the information needed for the recovered application workflow, including CHAP details needed after recovery. ( Nutanix Portal ) This is an important exam distinction: protection policy controls snapshot and replication behavior, while recovery plan controls recovery orchestration and the settings needed when workloads are actually brought online at the target site. Recovery points themselves are snapshots of protected entities; they are not the administrative mechanism Nutanix documents for persisting an updated CHAP target password through failover. So even though the uploaded file says option D, the official Nutanix guidance supports A. For failover success with CHAP-enabled VGs, always synchronize password changes with the recovery plan. ( Nutanix Portal )

NEW QUESTION 63
An administrator manages a shared AHV environment where Dev workloads must not exceed 2,000 IOPS per VM during business hours to prevent noisy-neighbor impact on Prod.
The administrator already uses categories to group VMs (for example, category Env=Dev) and wants a scalable approach that applies consistent throttling to all current and future Dev VMs without configuring each VM individually.
Which approach best meets the requirement?

Increase the replication factor for Dev workloads so additional copies distribute I/O and cap IOPS.

Configure a storage policy with QoS throttling and associate the policy to the category used by Dev VMs.

Set Storage QoS attributes on one representative Dev VM, then clone that VM so all Dev VMs inherit the QoS settings.

Enable compression on the storage container hosting Dev VMs to reduce latency and enforce an effective IOPS limit.

Nutanix documents Storage QoS as the correct mechanism to throttle VM I/O and prevent noisy-neighbor behavior. Nutanix also documents that storage policies in Prism Central apply to Categories, and that QoS settings such as throttled IOPS can be defined in the storage policy itself. That means the administrator can create one policy, set the IOPS cap, and apply it to the category assigned to Dev VMs. Current and future VMs with that category then inherit the same behavior without one-by-one configuration. That is exactly the scalable model described in option B.
The other options do not meet the requirement as cleanly. Replication factor affects resilience, not IOPS governance. Cloning one VM’s QoS is not a robust policy framework for future operations, especially when category-based automation already exists. Compression changes storage efficiency and sometimes performance characteristics, but it does not function as an enforceable per-VM IOPS cap. Because Nutanix explicitly ties QoS throttling to storage policies and category-based assignment, B is the documented and most maintainable answer.

NEW QUESTION 64
An administrator configures network segmentation and places the Data Services IP (DSIP) in a secondary non- routable subnet while the cluster is registered to Prism Central. Prism Central cannot initiate or complete cluster upgrades. How should the administrator resolve this issue?

Configure an additional DSIP within the original subnet used for PC communication.

Use a single uplink because segmented networks do not tolerate redundancy.

Disable segmentation on the local cluster until the next upgrade cycle.

Enable proxy ARP within the Nutanix VLAN to establish reachability.

NEW QUESTION 65
An administrator needs to ensure that if a host remains in a disconnected status for 40 seconds, VMs running on a host are automatically restarted.
What method should the administrator use to ensure root file system corruption has not occurred and that the root file system of a host isn ‘ t in a read-only state?

Host-based reservation method

Root file system corruption method

Segment-based reservation method

Scheduler-based reservation method

Nutanix AHV High Availability documentation states that if a host remains disconnected for 40 seconds, VMs on that host can be automatically restarted based on HA settings. The same Nutanix documentation also explains that AHV uses the segment-based reservation method for guaranteed VM High Availability and that the older host-based reservation method is deprecated. Since the question asks which method should be used in that HA context, the correct answer is segment-based reservation method. ( Nutanix ) The wording about root filesystem corruption and read-only state appears to mix HA behavior with host health validation, but among the listed choices only segment-based reservation is an actual current Nutanix HA reservation method documented for this purpose. “Root file system corruption method” and “scheduler- based reservation method” are not valid Nutanix reservation methods. Because Nutanix explicitly says Acropolis uses segment-based reservation for guaranteed HA, that is the best and supported answer even if the question stem is somewhat awkwardly phrased. Therefore, C is correct. ( Nutanix )

NEW QUESTION 66
What should be done once Prism Central is restored?

Configure DNS

Replace the certificate

Configure the IP

Reset the credentials

Here the uploaded answer key says B, but the current Nutanix documentation for post-restoration considerations says that after restoring Prism Central, administrators should reset the credentials, and it explicitly lists that as a post-restore action. The same Nutanix page also mentions other follow-up tasks such as reconfiguring the proxy server or FQDN if needed, but resetting credentials is directly named as a required post-restoration consideration. Because the question asks what should be done once Prism Central is restored, the most documentation-faithful answer is D. Reset the credentials. ( Nutanix Portal ) The confusion probably comes from related Nutanix guidance that after a restore, some services may continue with self-signed certificates or rotate certificates as part of Microservices Infrastructure behavior. That can make certificate replacement necessary in some environments, but it is not the clearest universal immediate post-restore action documented in the restoration considerations. By contrast, reset the credentials is explicitly listed in the post-restoration guidance. So for an authentic study guide grounded in Nutanix docs rather than only the source key, D is the correct answer. ( Nutanix Portal )

NEW QUESTION 67
An administrator must configure a VM which would run a write-intensive application on a hybrid NVMe + SSD cluster. When setting VM options, which action would give the best performance?

Isolate storage traffic with network segmentation.

Enable Load Balance Volume Group.

Configure a dedicated RF3 storage container.

Set Flash Mode at the VM level.

For a write-intensive, latency-sensitive VM running on a hybrid cluster, the Nutanix feature that most directly improves storage performance at the VM object level is Flash Mode. Nutanix documents describe Flash Mode for VMs, disks, and volume groups as a way to set the storage tier preference to SSD, specifically for workloads that are sensitive to latency. That is exactly the design intent of this setting: instead of depending only on normal tiering behavior, you explicitly bias the workload toward flash storage so hot write data stays on the fast tier more consistently. ( Nutanix Portal ) The other choices are either indirect or aimed at different outcomes. Network segmentation isolates traffic, but it does not by itself pin or prefer the VM’s storage data on flash. Load balancing for volume groups is relevant to externally attached block storage patterns, not a general VM write-intensive optimization. A dedicated RF3 container affects resilience and usable capacity, but it does not inherently outperform Flash Mode for a single VM’s storage path. Nutanix’s own wording for Flash Mode specifically calls out latency- sensitive applications, which is why it is the best fit here. ( Nutanix Portal )

NEW QUESTION 68
An administrator is troubleshooting intermittent VM I/O stalls that appear across hosts and clusters.
The issue is sporadic, and the administrator needs to rapidly collect the correct platform logs for deeper analysis and possible escalation. The administrator wants to use a supported mechanism designed for efficient log collection, and must ensure the environment prerequisites are met so the tool can be used successfully.
Which option correctly describes the supported approach and a key prerequisite?

Use Logbay to collect logs, which is available once the node has a CVM deployed or the AHV compute node has been added to the cluster.

Use Panacea to troubleshoot the incident, retrieving the required host and CVM logs directly, without first collecting a log bundle from the cluster.

Use storage policy compliance reports and evaluations, include the underlying system logs needed to diagnose performance issues.

Use ADS to export diagnostic bundles automatically whenever built-in log collection function detects contention hotspots.

Nutanix documents Logbay as the preferred and supported mechanism for efficient platform log collection.
The AHV administration guide states that you can use Logbay only after the CVM is installed on the node or the AHV compute node has been added to the cluster, which directly matches the wording in option A.
Nutanix’s web-console guidance also points administrators toward Logbay as the preferred collection method rather than relying only on manual UI collection.
The other options describe tools or behaviors that do not match Nutanix’s documented collection path for this scenario. Panacea is not the standard answer for supported cluster log-bundle collection in the way described.
Storage policy reports are not substitutes for host/CVM diagnostic logs, and ADS does not function as an automatic diagnostic bundle exporter for arbitrary contention events. Because the question asks for both the supported approach and a key prerequisite, Logbay with the documented availability condition is the most precise Nutanix answer. Therefore A is correct.

NEW QUESTION 69
An administrator needs to protect a group of mission-critical virtual machines.
The business requirements are:
* Recovery Point Objective (RPO) must be set to 5 minutes.
* New mission critical VMs should be automatically protected.
Which data protection type supports this configuration?

Protection Domain with NearSync replication

Protection Policy with NearSync replication

Protection Domain with Asynchronous replication

Protection Policy with Asynchronous replication

A required RPO of 5 minutes immediately points to NearSync replication, because Nutanix documents NearSync protection policies as supporting recovery points in 1-15 minute intervals. The second requirement-automatically protect new mission-critical VMs-points to a Protection Policy approach in Prism Central, because protection policies can use categories and policy-based assignment to scale protection dynamically as new matching VMs are added. Combining those two requirements makes Protection Policy with NearSync replication the correct answer. ( Nutanix ) Protection Domains can support NearSync in older or alternate workflows, but the phrase “new mission critical VMs should be automatically protected” is the clue that pushes this question toward policy-based protection rather than manually maintained membership. Asynchronous replication also fails the first requirement because its RPO target is not the 5-minute class represented by NearSync. Nutanix’s modern DR design encourages policy-driven protection for scalable, category-based administration. Therefore B is the best fit for both the RPO and automatic-inclusion requirements. ( Nutanix )

NEW QUESTION 70
A company has purchased Nutanix hardware for multiple remote branch offices. The IT team at headquarters needs to image and deploy all clusters remotely from a central location.
An administrator deploys Foundation Central from the Prism Central Marketplace.
What capability does Foundation Central provide in this scenario?

Automated backup and recovery of cluster configurations across all sites

Ability to remotely upgrade AOS and AHV on existing clusters

Ability to register all remote clusters to Prism Central automatically after deployment

Single pane of glass to create remote clusters without individual node configuration

Foundation Central is about deployment centralization, not backup, lifecycle upgrades, or automatic registration workflows as its main value proposition. Nutanix documentation describes Foundation Central as a tool that can manage several Foundation instances from a single pane of glass, allowing administrators to create clusters of remote nodes. That statement maps directly to option D. ( Nutanix Portal ) The subtle point here is that the question mentions Marketplace only as the method used to deploy Foundation Central, not as the capability being tested. Once deployed, Foundation Central’s job is to simplify remote cluster creation at scale. It does not replace LCM for software upgrades, nor is its primary role to perform backup and recovery of cluster configurations. Automatic cluster registration may happen as part of broader operational workflows, but it is not the core capability Nutanix emphasizes in the product description. In the context of imaging and deploying many branch-office clusters from a central team, the defining capability is centralized cluster creation and management visibility. That is why D is the right answer. ( Nutanix Portal )

NEW QUESTION 71
A node in a 3-node cluster is running out of physical resources. All three nodes are equally configured. An administrator wants to live migrate VMs to another node, but is unable to do so.
What is causing this issue?

VMs have vNUMA enabled.

VMs have vGPU.

VMs have memory overcommitment.

VMs have GPU passthrough.

Nutanix documentation clearly states that guest VMs with GPU passthrough cannot be migrated to other hosts in the cluster. By contrast, Nutanix does support live migration for some vGPU- enabled VMs under supported conditions, but not for passthrough GPUs. That distinction is exactly what this question is testing.
Therefore the correct answer is D. ( portal.nutanix.com , portal.nutanix.com , portal.nutanix.com ) This is a high-value exam distinction: vGPU and GPU passthrough are not interchangeable in migration behavior. Memory overcommitment and vNUMA may affect placement or performance, but they are not the documented hard stop presented here. If a VM uses GPU passthrough, live migration is not supported, so the administrator cannot evacuate it the way they can with ordinary VMs.

NEW QUESTION 72
An administrator manages a Nutanix cluster hosting a mixed workload environment, including general- purpose VMs and a specific group of high-sensitivity ” PCI-DSS ” database servers. The cluster is currently configured with ” Data-at-Rest Encryption ” disabled at the global cluster level.
A new security mandate requires that all data associated with the ” PCI-DSS ” workloads must be encrypted at rest using a dedicated external Key Management Server (KMS) for key rotation. The general-purpose VMs, however, must remain unencrypted to avoid unnecessary encryption overhead. The administrator has already deployed and registered the required KMS instance with Prism Central.
Which sequence of configuration steps should the administrator perform in Prism Central to meet this specific encryption requirement?

Enable Cluster-level Encryption in the Data-at-Rest settings and exclude all categories except the category assigned to the PCI-DSS VMs.

Create a new Storage Container with ” Software Encryption ” enabled, map it to the external KMS, and migrate the PCI VMs to this container.

Create a new Storage Policy, enable encryption within the policy settings, and associate it with category assigned to the PCI-DSS VMs.

Deploy a dedicated Key Management Server and configure the PCI-DSS VMs to use guest-OS level BitLocker encryption.

Nutanix supports storage policy-based encryption in Prism Central, which is exactly the right mechanism when only a subset of workloads needs encryption. Nutanix documentation explains that in addition to cluster- level encryption, administrators can configure storage policies to encrypt data at rest and apply those policies selectively. Since the PCI-DSS workloads are already logically groupable by category, the proper design is to create a storage policy with encryption enabled and then associate it with the category assigned to those VMs.
That makes C correct. ( portal.nutanix.com , portal.nutanix.com , portal.nutanix.com ) Cluster-level encryption would encrypt too much, which violates the requirement to leave general-purpose VMs unencrypted. Guest OS BitLocker is a separate operating-system control, not the Nutanix platform answer being tested here. Container-centric thinking is older and less flexible than policy-based encryption.
Nutanix’s policy model is the authentic platform-aligned solution for category-scoped encryption using an external KMS.

NEW QUESTION 73
An administrator is planning a new AHV cluster deployment with multiple nodes and wants to include a cluster virtual IP for external access.
How many IPv4 addresses should be reserved?

Two IPs per node + 2 IPs for VIP addresses

Four IPs per node + 1 IP for VIP address

Three IPs per node + 1 IP for VIP address

Three IPs per node + 2 IPs for VIP addresses

For a standard AHV cluster deployment, each node typically requires one IP for the hypervisor host, one for the Controller VM (CVM), and one for IPMI or management access. Nutanix cluster-creation and expansion documentation repeatedly references entering host, CVM, and IPMI addresses for each node. If the administrator also wants a cluster virtual IP, that adds one additional IP for the cluster VIP. This results in three IPs per node plus one VIP, which is option C. ( Nutanix ) The answer choices with four IPs per node overstate the standard requirement, while the two-VIP choices add an extra VIP not requested in the question. Nutanix documentation for cluster details also distinguishes the per-node addresses from the optional virtual IP used for cluster access. So the clean way to think about this is:
per node = host + CVM + IPMI, plus one shared VIP for the cluster. That aligns exactly with C. ( Nutanix )

NEW QUESTION 74
An administrator is tasked with using Nutanix Move to migrate a VM from Hyper-V to Nutanix AHV. What must be deployed on the Hyper-V host to facilitate migration?

Nutanix Move

Nutanix VirtIO drivers

Nutanix Guest Tools

Nutanix Move Agent

Nutanix Move documentation states that when migrating VMs from Hyper-V to AOS/AHV, a Nutanix Move agent service is deployed on the Hyper-V host. Nutanix provides dedicated procedures for deploying the Move Agent on Hyper-V, both manually and automatically. That makes D the correct answer.
This is a common migration-tool distinction. Nutanix Move is the migration platform, but the question asks what specifically must be deployed on the Hyper-V host. The answer is not VirtIO drivers or NGT, because those serve different purposes. Nutanix explicitly documents the Move Agent as the source-host component used for Hyper-V migrations. Therefore the authentic exam answer is D. Nutanix Move Agent.

NEW QUESTION 75
An administrator has been tasked with migrating VMs out of a storage container that isn ‘ t using compression and is using a non-standard naming convention. The administrator needs to do other administrative tasks during the vDisk live migration.
What administrative tasks can the administrator perform during the vDisk live migration?

Update memory and vCPU config of the VM

Protection domain based replication of the VM

Snapshot, clone, backup or resize the VM

Protection policy based replication of the VM

Here the uploaded answer key says C, but current Nutanix documentation says the opposite. Nutanix’s Live vDisk Migration Across Storage Containers documentation explicitly states that during an ongoing vDisk migration you cannot perform operations such as clone the VM, resize the VM, or take a snapshot. Nutanix also states, under DR considerations, that you should remove the VM from the protection domain or protection policy, migrate the vDisks, and then add the VM back afterward. That means the actions listed in option C are specifically blocked during vDisk live migration. ( Nutanix Portal ) Because all four answer choices are problematic against the current documentation, this is one of the questions I would flag as flawed in the source bank. The most accurate real-world Nutanix answer is: you should not perform snapshot, clone, resize, or DR policy/protection-domain operations during the migration.
So although the uploaded key marks C, the official docs indicate that C is not actually allowed. For your final study document, this question should ideally be corrected or rewritten because the documented AHV behavior does not cleanly support any listed option as a valid “can perform during migration” task. ( Nutanix Portal )

NEW QUESTION 76
An administrator reverts a VM to a recovery point using Prism Central. What is the expected behavior for the VM ‘ s categories and ownership after the revert?

Both the VM ‘ s categories and ownership revert to the state captured in the recovery point.

Categories are reverted to the recovery point state, but ownership is preserved.

Both the VM ‘ s categories and ownership are preserved at their current state.

Categories are preserved, but ownership reverts to the recovery point state.

Nutanix documentation for VM revert behavior in Prism Central states that categories are preserved by default when a VM is reverted to a recovery point. Nutanix further notes that if an administrator wants categories to revert to the state captured in the recovery point, that must be done by using a V4 API override rather than the standard default behavior. That directly rules out choices A and B in the ordinary UI-based revert scenario. The expected default behavior is preservation of current categories, not rollback of categories to historical values.
The same recovery-point workflow also preserves present-day management context such as ownership rather than reconstructing all metadata exactly as it existed at the earlier capture point. The reason is practical:
reverting the VM is primarily about workload state recovery, not about undoing every later governance assignment unless explicitly requested through advanced controls. From an administrator’s point of view, this is safer because access-control and ownership context is not unexpectedly rolled backward during a restore operation. Therefore the best answer is C: both the VM’s categories and ownership are preserved at their current state.

Loading …

Powerful NCP-MCI-7.5 PDF Dumps for NCP-MCI-7.5 Questions: https://www.latestcram.com/NCP-MCI-7.5-exam-cram-questions.html

Related Certifications

Workday-Pro-HCM-Reporting (1)

Free Cram & Latest Exams Dumps