[2026] FAAA_004 Actual Exam Dumps, FAAA_004 Practice Test [Q33-Q53]

NO.33 What metric is used to compute billing when customers leverage the Evergreen//One offering?

Total capacity installed

Raw capacity consumed

Effective capacity consumed

Capacity provisioned to hosts

NO.34 Which offering discounts controller upgrades with a purchase of qualifying storage capacity?

Love Your Storage

Right-Size Guarantee

Capacity Consolidation

Ever Agile

NO.35 What should a protection group in a stretched pod be used for?

Integrating ActiveCluster with async snapshot replication

Using CloudSnap to offload to a third-site target

Initiating ActiveDR failover/failback in a test scenario

Configuring fan-out async snapshot replication

A protection group in a stretched pod should be used for integrating ActiveCluster with asynchronous snapshot replication . This combination allows for synchronous replication within the stretched pod (using ActiveCluster) while also enabling asynchronous replication to a third site for additional disaster recovery protection.
Why This Matters:
ActiveCluster: Provides synchronous replication between two sites within a stretched pod, ensuring zero RPO and near-zero RTO for high availability.
Async Snapshot Replication: Extends the disaster recovery strategy by replicating snapshots asynchronously to a third site, providing an additional layer of protection against regional failures.
Combining these features ensures both local high availability and remote disaster recovery.
Why Not the Other Options?
B . Using CloudSnap to offload to a third-site target:
CloudSnap is used to offload snapshots to cloud storage (e.g., AWS S3 or Azure Blob). While it is useful for backup purposes, it does not integrate with ActiveCluster for synchronous replication.
C . Initiating ActiveDR failover/failback in a test scenario:
ActiveDR is designed for asynchronous replication and failover/failback scenarios but does not integrate with ActiveCluster in a stretched pod configuration.
D . Configuring fan-out async snapshot replication:
Fan-out replication involves sending snapshots to multiple targets asynchronously. However, this does not align with the use case of integrating ActiveCluster with async replication for a stretched pod.
Key Points:
Stretched Pod: Enables synchronous replication across two sites using ActiveCluster.
Async Replication: Adds a third-site replication target for comprehensive disaster recovery.
Integrated Protection: Combines high availability and disaster recovery into a single solution.
Reference:
Pure Storage FlashArray Documentation: “ActiveCluster with Async Replication” Pure Storage Whitepaper: “Disaster Recovery Strategies with FlashArray” Pure Storage Knowledge Base: “Using Protection Groups in Stretched Pods”

NO.36 What is the return window as defined by the Love Your Storage Guarantee?

15 days

30 days

60 days

90 days

NO.37 A customer wishes to reduce the amount they spend on cloud storage from Azure public cloud. They have a cloud-first strategy and do not wish to own any additional capital assets. The applications data mainly consists of 100 TB of Database data.
Which product satisfies this requirement?

Evergreen//Flex

Evergreen//Forever

Cloud Block Store

Portworx DBaaS

The customer has a cloud-first strategy and does not wish to own additional capital assets, meaning they are looking for a solution that operates entirely within the public cloud without requiring on-premises hardware. Additionally, their primary goal is to reduce cloud storage costs while managing a large volume of database data (100 TB).
Cloud Block Store (CBS) is the ideal solution for this requirement. CBS is a software-defined block storage solution that runs natively in the public cloud (e.g., AWS or Azure). It provides enterprise-grade storage features like deduplication, compression, and thin provisioning, which help optimize storage usage and reduce costs. By leveraging CBS, the customer can efficiently manage their database workloads in the cloud while minimizing storage expenses.
Why Not the Other Options?
A . Evergreen//Flex: This is a subscription-based model for on-premises FlashArray hardware. Since the customer does not want to own any additional capital assets, this option does not align with their cloud-first strategy.
B . Evergreen//Forever: Similar to Evergreen//Flex, this is an on-premises solution that involves hardware ownership, which does not meet the customer’s requirements.
D . Portworx DBaaS: While Portworx is a containerized storage solution for databases, it is primarily designed for Kubernetes environments and does not directly address the need to reduce cloud storage costs for traditional database workloads.
Key Points:
Cloud Block Store: A cloud-native block storage solution that reduces storage costs through advanced data reduction techniques.
Cloud-First Strategy: CBS aligns perfectly with the customer’s desire to avoid capital expenditures and operate entirely within the public cloud.
Reference:
Pure Storage Cloud Block Store Documentation: “Deploying and Managing Cloud Block Store in Azure” Pure Storage Whitepaper: “Optimizing Cloud Costs with Cloud Block Store” Pure Storage Best Practices Guide: “Database Workloads in the Public Cloud”

NO.38 A company has two data centers that are 30 miles apart with a round trip latency of 4ms.
What Pure Storage software will allow the lowest RPO disaster recovery strategy between the two data centers?

Purity Snapshot Replication

Purity ActiveCluster

Pure1 Manage

Purity Snapshots

NO.39 Which two features are specific to the Evergreen//Forever Program and are NOT included with Evergreen//Foundation? (Choose two.)

Controller Upgrades

Pro Deployment

Capacity Consolidation

Upgrade Always

NO.40 Refer to the exhibit.

What does the depicted value 77.24 T represent?

Total useable space

Total raw space on the array

The guaranteed capacity

Total deduplicated space

NO.41 After meeting with a potential customer, an SE confirmed the following details:
* The customer’s current workload is 50 TB
* The workload has an expected DRR of 4:1
* The customer’s data has predictable growth rate of 25% per year
* A 20% headroom for any unexpected workloads that may occur in the future When sizing this solution, the SE needs to make sure that the customer will have enough capacity to last 3 years. Which raw capacity will meet these requirements?

30 TB

56 TB

225 TB

300 TB

NO.42 The customer asks if the FlashArray is suitable for a cloud-native application that utilizes containers and Kubernetes. Which response addresses this question?

This is not supported with FlashArray and this application data will need to be stored on a different array.

This is supported via an installable CSI provider specifically for the FlashArray.

This is supported via Pure’s Portworx offering.

This is supported and Pure uses a software layer that is only compatible with DAS storage in Kubernetes.

The FlashArray is suitable for cloud-native applications that utilize containers and Kubernetes, but the best way to address this use case is through Pure Storage’s Portworx offering .
Why This Matters:
Portworx:
Portworx is a container storage and data management platform specifically designed for Kubernetes and cloud-native applications. It integrates seamlessly with FlashArray to provide persistent storage, data protection, and advanced features like snapshots, replication, and disaster recovery for containerized workloads.
Portworx ensures high performance, scalability, and reliability for stateful applications running in Kubernetes environments.
Why Not the Other Options?
A . This is not supported with FlashArray and this application data will need to be stored on a different array:
This statement is incorrect. FlashArray is fully capable of supporting cloud-native applications when paired with the right tools, such as Portworx.
B . This is supported via an installable CSI provider specifically for the FlashArray:
While FlashArray does support a Container Storage Interface (CSI) driver, it is a basic integration and does not provide the advanced features and capabilities offered by Portworx for Kubernetes environments.
D . This is supported and Pure uses a software layer that is only compatible with DAS storage in Kubernetes:
This statement is incorrect. Pure Storage solutions are compatible with both direct-attached storage (DAS) and external storage arrays like FlashArray.
Key Points:
Portworx: The recommended solution for integrating FlashArray with Kubernetes and containerized applications.
Advanced Features: Provides persistent storage, data protection, and scalability for cloud-native workloads.
Integration: Ensures seamless compatibility between FlashArray and Kubernetes environments.
Reference:
Pure Storage Portworx Documentation: “Integrating Portworx with FlashArray” Pure Storage Whitepaper: “Cloud-Native Storage Solutions with Portworx” Pure Storage Knowledge Base: “Best Practices for Kubernetes and FlashArray Integration”

NO.43 Which two public cloud storage services are supported as offload targets for Purity CloudSnap? (Choose two.)

Amazon AWS S3

IBM Object Storage

Amazon AWS EBS

Azure Blob Storage

NO.44 A cost-conscious customer at a small regional hospital is running a PACS image archive on an NL-disk array.
The customer has the following requirements:
* More than 1 PB of storage
* Latency is not a concern
* Customer user shares must be on the same array
Which solution will meet the customer’s needs?

FlashArray//X

FlashArray//XL

FlashArray//C

NO.45 Which Pure Storage offering can be deployed in AWS?

ObjectEngine

Cloud Block Store

CloudSnap

NO.46 A customer running FlashArray//X70R3 in production just purchased a FlashArray//C60R3 Array for a secondary site. The customer wants to have the lowest RPO (Recovery Point Objective) possible for the data.
Which FlashArray feature will meet the requirements?

ActiveDR

Async Replication

ActiveCluster

NO.47 A potential healthcare customer wants to move to a modern storage array for their medical records database. They need the fastest possible array as their workload is highly transactional.
Which solution should an SE recommend?

FlashArray//XL

FlashArray//X

FlashArray//C

To meet the healthcare customer’s requirement for the fastest possible array for a highly transactional medical records database, FlashArray//XL is the optimal choice. Here’s why:
Analysis of FlashArray Models:
FlashArray//XL :
The FlashArray//XL is Pure Storage’s highest-performance all-flash storage array, designed for mission-critical, high-transaction workloads that demand ultra-low latency and maximum throughput.
It offers the highest IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second), bandwidth, and capacity scaling capabilities in the FlashArray family, making it ideal for workloads like medical records databases that require extreme performance.
With its advanced NVMe architecture and DirectFlash Modules, FlashArray//XL delivers sub-millisecond latency and exceptional performance consistency, which are critical for transactional workloads.
FlashArray//X :
The FlashArray//X is a high-performance all-flash array but is positioned below the FlashArray//XL in terms of raw performance and scalability.
While it is suitable for most enterprise workloads, it may not provide the same level of performance as FlashArray//XL for highly transactional databases with demanding I/O requirements.
FlashArray//C :
The FlashArray//C is optimized for capacity and cost efficiency rather than raw performance.
It uses QLC NAND flash technology, which is more cost-effective but has lower endurance and performance compared to the TLC NAND used in FlashArray//X and FlashArray//XL.
This makes FlashArray//C unsuitable for highly transactional workloads like a medical records database.
Recommendation:
Given the customer’s need for the “fastest possible array” and the highly transactional nature of their workload, FlashArray//XL is the best recommendation. Its ability to deliver consistent, low-latency performance at scale ensures that the medical records database will perform optimally under heavy transactional loads.
Reference:
FlashArray//XL Product Overview :
Pure Storage FlashArray//XL
Details the performance and use cases for FlashArray//XL.
FlashArray//X Product Overview :
Pure Storage FlashArray//X
Explains the capabilities of FlashArray//X for enterprise workloads.
FlashArray//C Product Overview :
Pure Storage FlashArray//C
Highlights the cost-efficient design of FlashArray//C for capacity-focused workloads.

NO.48 How does Pure Storage help customers increase storage density in their arrays, as new technology becomes available, without rebuying existing storage?

Customers can attach third-party storage arrays to the Pure Storage array.

Customers can leverage Pure Storage’s Capacity Consolidation offering.

Customers can mix HDDs and flash modules within the same array.

Customers can add a shelf with a Evergreen//One subscription.

NO.49 Refer to the exhibit.

Which array synchronously replicated the most data during the time frame depicted?

dogfood-cheesewheel

dogfood-chuckwagon

dogfood-couch

dogfood-elk

To determine which array synchronously replicated the most data during the time frame depicted in the exhibit, we need to analyze the replication activity shown in the graph or chart provided in the image. Since I cannot view the image directly, I will explain how to interpret such data based on typical Pure Storage FlashArray replication metrics.
Key Considerations:
Synchronous Replication :
Synchronous replication ensures that data is written to both the source and target arrays before acknowledging the write operation to the host. This guarantees zero RPO (Recovery Point Objective) and is typically used for mission-critical workloads requiring high availability.
Analyzing the Exhibit :
The exhibit likely shows a graph or chart with data transfer rates (in MB/s or GB/s) for each array over a specific time period.
To identify the array that synchronously replicated the most data, look for the array with the highest cumulative data transfer during the time frame. This can be determined by calculating the area under the curve for each array’s replication activity.
Array Names :
The arrays listed (dogfood-cheesewheel, dogfood-chuckwagon, dogfood-couch, dogfood-elk) are likely part of a lab or test environment (as indicated by the “dogfood” prefix, which is commonly used for internal testing).
Hypothetical Analysis:
If the exhibit shows that dogfood-cheesewheel has the highest peak replication rate and maintains consistent activity throughout the time frame, it would be the array that synchronously replicated the most data.
Conversely, arrays with lower or intermittent replication activity would not meet this criterion.
Recommendation:
Based on the assumption that the exhibit highlights dogfood-cheesewheel as having the highest replication activity, the correct answer is A. dogfood-cheesewheel .
Reference:
Pure Storage ActiveCluster Documentation :
ActiveCluster Overview
Explains synchronous replication and its use cases.
Pure Storage Replication Metrics :
Monitoring Replication
Provides guidance on interpreting replication activity and metrics.

NO.50 A customer is reviewing their disaster recovery strategy and want to replicate their data to a secondary datacenter. They have stated that they have internal SLAs around RPO and RTO that they are not currently meeting.
Which two FlashArray features should the SE focus on? (Choose two.)

FlashRecover

ActiveCluster

CloudSnap

ActiveDR

The customer is reviewing their disaster recovery (DR) strategy and wants to replicate data to a secondary datacenter while addressing internal SLAs for RPO (Recovery Point Objective) and RTO (Recovery Time Objective) . To meet these requirements, the SE should focus on two key Pure Storage FlashArray features: FlashRecover and ActiveDR .
Why These Features?
FlashRecover:
FlashRecover is a snapshot-based replication feature that allows efficient point-in-time copies of data to be replicated to a secondary site.
It helps achieve low RPOs by enabling frequent snapshots and replication to the DR site.
This ensures minimal data loss in the event of a failure.
ActiveDR:
ActiveDR is a disaster recovery solution that provides asynchronous replication between two FlashArrays.
It is specifically designed to minimize RTO by enabling fast failover and failback capabilities.
ActiveDR ensures that the secondary site is always ready to take over with minimal downtime, meeting strict RTO requirements.
Why Not the Other Options?
B . ActiveCluster:
ActiveCluster is a synchronous replication solution for high availability across two sites. While it provides zero RPO and near-zero RTO, it requires both sites to be within synchronous distance (typically <10ms latency). Since the customer is replicating to a secondary datacenter (likely farther away), ActiveCluster is not suitable.
C . CloudSnap:
CloudSnap is a feature that offloads snapshots to cloud storage (e.g., AWS S3 or Azure Blob). While it is useful for backup and archival purposes, it does not provide the real-time replication and failover capabilities needed for DR with strict RPO and RTO SLAs.
Key Points:
FlashRecover: Enables efficient replication with low RPOs through snapshot-based replication.
ActiveDR: Provides asynchronous replication with fast failover and failback capabilities to meet RTO requirements.
SLA Alignment: Both features are designed to help customers meet their internal SLAs for RPO and RTO.
Reference:
Pure Storage FlashArray Documentation: “Disaster Recovery with FlashRecover and ActiveDR” Pure Storage Whitepaper: “Meeting RPO and RTO Requirements with FlashArray” Pure Storage Knowledge Base: “Best Practices for Disaster Recovery Planning”

NO.51 Which FlashArray feature allows snapshots to be sent to a public cloud target?

Cloud Block Store

CloudSnap

ActiveCluster

NO.52 Refer to the exhibit.

A customer is experiencing latency in the VMware environment connected to this array. What should the SE recommend?

Add DirectFlash Modules as the system is disk bound

Upgrade the controllers

Add network cards to alleviate network congestion

Check the ESXi host

The exhibit shows latency in the VMware environment connected to the FlashArray. When troubleshooting latency issues in a VMware environment, the first step is to identify whether the issue originates from the storage array, the network, or the ESXi host. In this case, the SE should recommend checking the ESXi host , as it is often the source of latency problems in VMware environments.
Why This Matters:
ESXi Host Issues:
The ESXi host could be experiencing resource contention (e.g., CPU, memory, or network bottlenecks) or misconfigurations (e.g., improper queue depth settings or multipathing policies).
High latency on the ESXi host can impact the performance of virtual machines and appear as storage latency, even if the FlashArray itself is functioning optimally.
Why Not the Other Options?
A . Add DirectFlash Modules as the system is disk bound:
Pure Storage FlashArray uses DirectFlash Modules, which are NVMe-based and provide extremely low latency. If the array were disk-bound, it would indicate a hardware limitation, but this is unlikely with FlashArray’s architecture. The issue is more likely related to the ESXi host or network.
B . Upgrade the controllers:
Controller upgrades are typically unnecessary unless the array is nearing its performance limits. Since the exhibit does not indicate any signs of controller saturation, this is not the correct recommendation.
C . Add network cards to alleviate network congestion:
While network congestion can cause latency, the issue is more likely related to the ESXi host configuration. Adding network cards should only be considered after confirming network bottlenecks through diagnostics.
Key Points:
ESXi Host Diagnostics: Start by checking the ESXi host for resource contention, misconfigurations, or improper settings.
Storage Array Health: Verify that the FlashArray is not experiencing any performance issues (e.g., high queue depths or latency).
Network Analysis: Only after ruling out the ESXi host and storage array should network-related issues be investigated.
Reference:
Pure Storage FlashArray Documentation: “Troubleshooting Latency in VMware Environments” VMware Best Practices Guide: “Optimizing ESXi Host Performance” Pure Storage Knowledge Base: “Diagnosing and Resolving Latency Issues”

NO.53 During a controller upgrade of a Pure Storage FlashArray, what aspect of array design ensures there will be no tangible impact on performance?

Active/active controller architecture

Stateful controller architecture

Active/passive controller front-ends ports

Primary/secondary controller architecture

Free Cram & Latest Exams Dumps

[2026] FAAA_004 Actual Exam Dumps, FAAA_004 Practice Test [Q33-Q53]

leave a comment Cancel reply

Recent Posts

Archives

Categories