[Feb 20, 2026] Get Free Updates Up to 365 days On Developing NSE8_812 Braindumps [Q19-Q40]

[Feb 20, 2026] Get Free Updates Up to 365 days On Developing NSE8_812 Braindumps [Q19-Q40]

February 20, 2026 latestexam 0 Comments

4/5 - (1 vote)

[Feb 20, 2026] Get Free Updates Up to 365 days On Developing NSE8_812 Braindumps

Best Quality Fortinet NSE8_812 Exam Questions

Fortinet NSE8_812 exam is recommended for network security professionals who possess the Fortinet NSE7 certification or those who have equivalent knowledge and skills in network security. Fortinet NSE 8 – Written Exam (NSE8_812) certification is suitable for security architects, security administrators, network engineers, and other cybersecurity professionals who want to advance their career and demonstrate their expertise in Fortinet security solutions. Fortinet NSE 8 – Written Exam (NSE8_812) certification is also useful for organizations that use Fortinet products and services, as it ensures that their employees have the necessary skills and knowledge to deploy and manage their security infrastructure effectively.

Fortinet NSE8_812 certification exam is an important credential for network security professionals who work with Fortinet products and solutions. By passing NSE8_812 exam, you’ll be able to demonstrate your expertise in network security and advance your career in this field. If you’re interested in pursuing this certification, it’s important to prepare thoroughly and to have a solid understanding of all the topics covered on the exam.

Q19. A remote IT Team is in the process of deploying a FortiGate in their lab. The closed environment has been configured to support zero-touch provisioning from the FortiManager, on the same network, via DHCP options. After waiting 15 minutes, they are reporting that the FortiGate received an IP address, but the zero-touch process failed.
The exhibit below shows what the IT Team provided while troubleshooting this issue:

Which statement explains why the FortiGate did not install its configuration from the FortiManager?

The FortiGate was not configured with the correct pre-shared key to connect to the FortiManager

The DHCP server was not configured with the FQDN of the FortiManager

The DHCP server used the incorrect option type for the FortiManager IP address.

The configuration was modified on the FortiGate prior to connecting to the FortiManager

C is correct because the DHCP server used the incorrect option type for the FortiManager IP address. The option type should be 43 instead of 15, as shown in the FortiManager Administration Guide under Zero-Touch Provisioning > Configuring DHCP options for ZTP. References: https://docs.fortinet.com/document/fortimanager/7.4.0/administration-guide/568591/high-availability https://docs.fortinet.com/document/fortimanager/7.4.0/administration-guide/568591/high-availability/568592/configuring-ha-options

Q20. A Hub FortiGate is connecting multiple branch FortiGate devices separating the traffic centrally in unique VRFs. Routing information is exchanged using BGP between the Hub and the Branch FortiGate devices.
You want to efficiently enable route leaking of specific routes between the VRFs.
Which two steps are required to achieve this requirement? (Choose two.)

Create a vdom link between VRF10 and VRF12

Enable BGP recursive routing on the HUB FortiGate

Enable Multi-VDOM mode on the Hub FortiGate and add a VDOM to connect VRF10 and VRF12

Configure route-maps to leak the selected routes using BGP

https://docs.fortinet.com/document/fortigate/7.0.1/administration-guide/834664/route-leaking-between-vrfs- with-bgp

Q21. An administrator has configured a FortiGate device to authenticate SSL VPN users using digital certificates.
A FortiAuthenticator is the certificate authority (CA) and the OCSP server.
Part of the FortiGate configuration is shown below:

Based on this configuration, which authentication scenario will FortiGate deny?

The user certificate does not contain the OCSP URL.

FortiAuthenticator responds to an OCSP request that the user certificate authority is untrusted.

FortiAuthenticator responds to an OCSP request that the user certificate status is unknown.

Q22. Refer to the exhibit showing the history logs from a FortiMail device.

Which FortiMail email security feature can an administrator enable to treat these emails as spam?

DKIM validation in a session profile

Sender domain validation in a session profile

Impersonation analysis in an antispam profile

Soft fail SPF validation in an antispam profile

Impersonation analysis is a feature that detects emails that attempt to impersonate a trusted sender, such as a company executive or a well-known brand, by using spoofed or look-alike email addresses. This feature can help prevent phishing and business email compromise (BEC) attacks. Impersonation analysis can be enabled in an antispam profile and applied to a firewall policy. References:https://docs.fortinet.com/document/fortimail
/6.4.0/administration-guide/103663/impersonation-analysis
https://docs.fortinet.com/document/fortimail/7.2.0/cookbook/221814/protecting-against-email-impersonation- in-fortimail

Q23. Refer to the exhibit.

A FortiWeb appliance is configured for load balancing web sessions to internal web servers. The Server Pool is configured as shown in the exhibit.
How will the sessions be load balanced between server 1 and server 2 during normal operation?

Server 1 will receive 25% of the sessions, Server 2 will receive 75% of the sessions

Server 1 will receive 20% of the sessions, Server 2 will receive 66.6% of the sessions

Server 1 will receive 33.3% of the sessions, Server 2 will receive 66 6% of the sessions

Server 1 will receive 0% of the sessions Server 2 will receive 100% of the sessions

Q24. Refer to the CLI configuration of an SSL inspection profile from a FortiGate device configured to protect a web server:

Based on the information shown, what is the expected behavior when an HTTP/2 request comes in?

FortiGate will reject all HTTP/2 ALPN headers.

FortiGate will strip the ALPN header and forward the traffic.

FortiGate will rewrite the ALPN header to request HTTP/1.

FortiGate will forward the traffic without modifying the ALPN header.

https://docs.fortinet.com/document/fortigate/7.0.0/new-features/710924/http-2-support-in-proxy-mode-ssl- inspection

Q25. A customer’s cybersecurity department needs to implement security for the traffic between two VPCs in AWS, but these belong to different departments within the company. The company uses a single region for all their VPCs.
Which two actions will achieve this requirement while keeping separate management of each department’s VPC? (Choose two.)

Create a transit VPC with a FortiGate HA cluster, connect to the other two using VPC peering, and use routing tables to force traffic through the FortiGate cluster.

Create an 1AM account for the cybersecurity department to manage both existing VPC, create a FortiGate HA Cluster on each VPC and IPSEC VPN to force traffic between the VPCs through the FortiGate clusters

Migrate all the instances to the same VPC and create 1AM accounts for each department, then implement a new subnet for a FortiGate auto-scaling group and use routing tables to force the traffic through the FortiGate cluster.

Create a VPC with a FortiGate auto-scaling group with a Transit Gateway attached to the three VPC to force routing through the FortiGate cluster

To implement security for the traffic between two VPCs in AWS, while keeping separate management of each department’s VPC, two possible actions are:
Create a transit VPC with a FortiGate HA cluster, connect to the other two using VPC peering, and use routing tables to force traffic through the FortiGate cluster. This option allows the cybersecurity department to manage the transit VPC and apply security policies on the FortiGate cluster, while the other departments can manage their own VPCs and instances. The VPC peering connections enable direct communication between the VPCs without using public IPs or gateways. The routing tables can be configured to direct all inter-VPC traffic to the transit VPC.
Create a VPC with a FortiGate auto-scaling group with a Transit Gateway attached to the three VPCs to force routing through the FortiGate cluster. This option also allows the cybersecurity department to manage the security VPC and apply security policies on the FortiGate cluster, while the other departments can manage their own VPCs and instances. The Transit Gateway acts as a network hub that connects multiple VPCs and on-premises networks. The routing tables can be configured to direct all inter-VPC traffic to the security VPC. Reference: https://docs.fortinet.com/document/fortigate-public-cloud/7.2.0/aws-administration-guide/506140/connecting-a-local-fortigate-to-an-aws-vpc-vpn https://docs.fortinet.com/document/fortigate-public-cloud/7.0.0/sd-wan-architecture-for-enterprise/166334/sd-wan-configuration

Q26. Refer to the exhibit showing the history logs from a FortiMail device.

Which FortiMail email security feature can an administrator enable to treat these emails as spam?

DKIM validation in a session profile

Sender domain validation in a session profile

Impersonation analysis in an antispam profile

Soft fail SPF validation in an antispam profile

Impersonation analysis is a feature that detects emails that attempt to impersonate a trusted sender, such as a company executive or a well-known brand, by using spoofed or look-alike email addresses. This feature can help prevent phishing and business email compromise (BEC) attacks. Impersonation analysis can be enabled in an antispam profile and applied to a firewall policy. References: https://docs.fortinet.com/document/fortimail/6.4.0/administration-guide/103663/impersonation-analysis

Q27. You are deploying a FortiExtender (FEX) on a FortiGate-60F. The FEX will be managed by the FortiGate. You anticipate high utilization. The requirement is to minimize the overhead on the device for WAN traffic.
Which action achieves the requirement in this scenario?

Add a switch between the FortiGate and FEX.

Enable CAPWAP connectivity between the FortiGate and the FortiExtender.

Change connectivity between the FortiGate and the FortiExtender to use VLAN Mode

Add a VLAN under the FEX-WAN interface on the FortiGate.

VLAN Mode is a more efficient way to connect a FortiExtender to a FortiGate than CAPWAP Mode. This is because VLAN Mode does not require the FortiExtender to send additional control traffic to the FortiGate.
The other options are not correct.
a) Add a switch between the FortiGate and FEX. This will add overhead to the network, as the switch will need to process the traffic.
b) Enable CAPWAP connectivity between the FortiGate and the FortiExtender. This will increase the overhead on the FortiGate, as it will need to process additional control traffic.
d) Add a VLAN under the FEX-WAN interface on the FortiGate. This will not affect the overhead on the FortiGate.

Q28. Refer to the exhibit.

A customer is trying to setup a Playbook automation using a FortiAnalyzer, FortiWeb and FortiGate. The intention is to have the FortiGate quarantine any source of SQL Injection detected by the FortiWeb. They got the automation stitch to trigger on the FortiGate when simulating an attack to their website, but the quarantine object was created with the IP 0.0.0.0. Referring to the configuration and logs in the exhibits, which two statements are true? (Choose two.)

The Group By option in the handler should be different to src, so src can be used on the Playbook configuration.

FortiSOC Playbooks combining FortiWeb and FortiGate are not supported.

To diagnose this issue, you need to use the commanddiagnose test application oftpd 22.

The FortiAnalyzer ADOM Type must be Fabric.

To fix the issue the parameter for script on the Playbook configuration should be epip.

Q29. You want to use the MTA adapter feature on FortiSandbox in an HA-Cluster. Which statement about this solution is true?

The configuration of the MTA Adapter Local Interface is different than on port1.

The MTA adapter is only available in the primary node.

The MTA adapter mode is only detection mode.

The configuration is different than on a standalone device.

The MTA adapter feature on FortiSandbox is a feature that allows FortiSandbox to act as a mail transfer agent (MTA) that can receive, inspect, and forward email messages from external sources. The MTA adapter feature can be used to integrate FortiSandbox with third-party email security solutions that do not support direct integration with FortiSandbox, such as Microsoft Exchange Server or Cisco Email Security Appliance (ESA). The MTA adapter feature can also be used to enhance email security by adding an additional layer of inspection and filtering before delivering email messages to the final destination. The MTA adapter feature can be enabled on FortiSandbox in an HA-Cluster, which is a configuration that allows two FortiSandbox units to synchronize their settings and data and provide high availability and load balancing for sandboxing services. However, one statement about this solution that is true is that the MTA adapter is only available in the primary node. This means that only one FortiSandbox unit in the HA-Cluster can act as an MTA and receive email messages from external sources, while the other unit acts as a backup node that can take over the MTA role if the primary node fails or loses connectivity. This also means that only one IP address or FQDN can be used to configure the external sources to send email messages to the FortiSandbox MTA, which is the IP address or FQDN of the primary node. References: https://docs.fortinet.com/document/fortisandbox
/3.2.0/administration-guide/19662/mail-transfer-agent-mtahttps://docs.fortinet.com/document/fortisandbox/3.
2.0/administration-guide/19662/high-availability-ha
https://docs.fortinet.com/document/fortisandbox/4.4.3/administration-guide/877925/mta-adapter

Q30. A customer’s cybersecurity department needs to implement security for the traffic between two VPCs in AWS, but these belong to different departments within the company. The company uses a single region for all their VPCs.
Which two actions will achieve this requirement while keeping separate management of each department’s VPC? (Choose two.)

Create a transit VPC with a FortiGate HA cluster, connect to the other two using VPC peering, and use routing tables to force traffic through the FortiGate cluster.

Create a VPC with a FortiGate auto-scaling group with a Transit Gateway attached to the three VPC to force routing through the FortiGate cluster

To implement security for the traffic between two VPCs in AWS, while keeping separate management of each department’s VPC, two possible actions are:
* Create a transit VPC with a FortiGate HA cluster, connect to the other two using VPC peering, and use routing tables to force traffic through the FortiGate cluster. This option allows the cybersecurity department to manage the transit VPC and apply security policies on the FortiGate cluster, while the other departments can manage their own VPCs and instances. The VPC peering connections enable direct communication between the VPCs without using public IPs or gateways. The routing tables can be configured to direct all inter-VPC traffic to the transit VPC.
* Create a VPC with a FortiGate auto-scaling group with a Transit Gateway attached to the three VPCs to force routing through the FortiGate cluster. This option also allows the cybersecurity department to manage the security VPC and apply security policies on the FortiGate cluster, while the other departments can manage their own VPCs and instances. The Transit Gateway acts as a network hub that connects multiple VPCs and on-premises networks. The routing tables can be configured to direct all inter-VPC traffic to the security VPC. References: https://docs.fortinet.com/document/fortigate-public- cloud/7.2.0/aws-administration-guide/506140/connecting-a-local-fortigate-to-an-aws-vpc-vpn
https://docs.fortinet.com/document/fortigate-public-cloud/7.0.0/sd-wan-architecture-for-enterprise/166334/sd-wan-configuration

Q31. An administrator has configured a FortiGate device to authenticate SSL VPN users using digital certificates. A FortiAuthenticator is the certificate authority (CA) and the Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) server.
Part of the FortiGate configuration is shown below:

Based on this configuration, which two statements are true? (Choose two.)

OCSP checks will always go to the configured FortiAuthenticator

The OCSP check of the certificate can be combined with a certificate revocation list.

OCSP certificate responses are never cached by the FortiGate.

If the OCSP server is unreachable, authentication will succeed if the certificate matches the CA.

A is correct because the OCSP server is configured as the FortiAuthenticator in the config vpn certificate ocsp-server section. D is correct because the config vpn ssl settings section has set ocsp-option to allow. This means that if the OCSP server is unreachable, authentication will succeed if the certificate matches the CA. Reference: https://docs.fortinet.com/document/fortigate/7.0.1/administration-guide/490351/ssl-vpn-authentication https://docs.fortinet.com/document/fortigate/7.4.0/administration-guide/266506/ssl-vpn-with-certificate-authentication

Q32. Refer to the exhibit.

You are operating an internal network with multiple OSPF routers on the same LAN segment. FGT_3 needs to be added to the OSPF network and has the configuration shown in the exhibit. FGT_3 is not establishing any OSPF connection.
What needs to be changed to the configuration to make sure FGT_3 will establish OSPF neighbors without affecting the DR/BDR election?

The OSPF configuration shown in the exhibit is using the default priority value of 1 for the interface port1. This means that FGT_3 will participate in the DR/BDR election process with the other OSPF routers on the same LAN segment. However, this is not desirable because FGT_3 is a new device that needs to be added to the OSPF network without affecting the existing DR/BDR election. Therefore, to make sure FGT_3 will establish OSPF neighbors without affecting the DR/BDR election, the priority value of the interface port1 should be changed to 0. This will prevent FGT_3 from becoming a DR or BDR and allow it to form OSPF adjacencies with the current DR and BDR. Option B shows the correct configuration that changes the priority value to 0. Option A is incorrect because it does not change the priority value. Option C is incorrect because it changes the network type to point-to-point, which is not suitable for a LAN segment with multiple OSPF routers. Option D is incorrect because it changes the area ID to 0.0.0.1, which does not match the area ID of the other OSPF routers on the same LAN segment. References: https://docs.fortinet.com/document/fortigate/7.0.0/administration-guide/358640/basic-ospf-example

Q33. An HA topology is using the following configuration:

Based on this configuration, how long will it take for a failover to be detected by the secondary cluster member?

600ms

200ms

300ms

100ms

https://docs.fortinet.com/document/fortigate/7.4.0/administration-guide/489324/failover-protection

Q34. You are creating the CLI script to be used on a new SD-WAN deployment You will have branches with a different number of internet connections and want to be sure there is no need to change the Performance SLA configuration in case more connections are added to the branch.
The current configuration is:

Which configuration do you use for the Performance SLA members?

set members any

set members 0

current configuration already fulfills the requirement

set members all

References:
* Performance SLA | FortiGate / FortiOS 7.4.0
* Configuring Performance SLA | FortiGate / FortiOS 7.4.0

Q35. Refer to the exhibits.

A customer has deployed a FortiGate with iBGP and eBGP routing enabled. HQ is receiving routes over eBGP from ISP 2; however, only certain routes are showing up in the routing table-Assume that BGP is working perfectly and that the only possible modifications to the routing table are solely due to the prefix list that is applied on HQ.
Given the exhibits, which two routes will be active in the routing table on the HQ firewall? (Choose two.)

172.16.204.128/25

172.16.201.96/29

172,620,64,27

172.16.204.64/27

The prefix list in the exhibit is configured to match prefixes that are either in the 172.16.204.0/24 subnet or in the 172.62.0.0/16 subnet. The routes that match these prefixes will be active in the routing table on the HQ firewall.
The routes that match the following prefixes will not be active in the routing table:
* 172.16.201.96/29
* 172.62.0.64/27
These routes do not match the criteria set by the prefix list.
References:
* Prefix lists | FortiGate / FortiOS 7.4.0 – Fortinet Document Library
* Configuring BGP | FortiGate / FortiOS 7.4.0 – Fortinet Document Library

Q36. Refer to the exhibit.

A customer has deployed a FortiGate 300E with virtual domains (VDOMs) enabled in the multi-VDOM mode. There are three VDOMs: Root is for management and internet access, while VDOM 1 and VDOM 2 are used for segregating internal traffic. AccountVInk and SalesVInk are standard VDOM links in Ethernet mode.
Given the exhibit, which two statements below about VDOM behavior are correct? (Choose two.)

You can apply OSPF routing on the VDOM link in either PPP or Ethernet mode

Traffic on AccountVInk and SalesVInk will not be accelerated.

The VDOM links are in Ethernet mode because they have IP addressed assigned on both sides.

Root VDOM is an Admin type VDOM, while VDOM 1 and VDOM 2 are Traffic type VDOMs.

OSPF routing can be configured between VDOM 1 and Root VDOM without any configuration changes to AccountVInk

Q37. Refer to the exhibit.

The Company Corp administrator has enabled Workflow mode in FortiManager and has assigned approval roles to the current administrators. However, workflow approval does not function as expected. The CTO is currently unable to approve submitted changes.
Given the exhibit, which two possible solutions will resolve the workflow approval problems with the Workflow_72 ADOM? (Choose two.)

The CTO must have a defined email address for their admin user account.

The CTO and CISO need to swap Approval Groups so that the highest authority is in Group #1.

The CTO must have Standard access level or higher for FortiManager.

The CISO must have a higher access level than “Read_Only_User” in FortiManager.

The CTO needs to be added to “Email Notification” in the Workflow_72 ADOM.

Q38. Which two types of interface have built-in active bypass in FortiDDoS devices? (Choose two.)

SFP

QSFP+

Copper

SFP+

https://help.fortinet.com/fddos/4-3-0/FortiDDoS/Built_in_bypass.htm

Q39. You are deploying a FortiExtender (FEX) on a FortiGate-60F. The FEX will be managed by the FortiGate. You anticipate high utilization. The requirement is to minimize the overhead on the device for WAN traffic.
Which action achieves the requirement in this scenario?

Add a switch between the FortiGate and FEX.

Enable CAPWAP connectivity between the FortiGate and the FortiExtender.

Change connectivity between the FortiGate and the FortiExtender to use VLAN Mode

Add a VLAN under the FEX-WAN interface on the FortiGate.

The FortiExtender (FEX) is a device that provides wireless WAN connectivity for FortiGate devices by using 3G/4G/LTE cellular networks. The FEX can be managed by the FortiGate device that it connects to, or by a FortiManager device in a centralized management scenario. The FEX can use either Ethernet or CAPWAP connectivity to communicate with the FortiGate device. Ethernet connectivity means that the FEX uses a standard Ethernet connection to send and receive data packets from the FortiGate device. CAPWAP connectivity means that the FEX uses a Control And Provisioning of Wireless Access Points (CAPWAP) tunnel to encapsulate data packets and send them over an IP network to the FortiGate device. If the requirement is to minimize the overhead on the device for WAN traffic, one option is to enable CAPWAP connectivity between the FortiGate and the FEX. This option can reduce the overhead on the device by offloading some of the processing tasks from the CPU to the NP6 processor, which can handle CAPWAP traffic more efficiently than Ethernet traffic. This option can also provide more flexibility and scalability for WAN traffic by allowing multiple FEX devices to connect to a single FortiGate device over an IP network. Reference: https://docs.fortinet.com/document/fortigate/7.0.0/cookbook/19662/configuring-fortigate-with-fortiextender https://docs.fortinet.com/document/fortigate/7.0.0/cookbook/19662/capwap-connectivity

Q40. What is the benefit of using FortiGate NAC LAN Segments?

It provides support for multiple DHCP servers within the same VLAN.

It provides physical isolation without changing the IP address of hosts.

It provides support for IGMP snooping between hosts within the same VLAN

It allows for assignment of dynamic address objects matching NAC policy.

FortiGate NAC LAN Segments are a feature that allows users to assign different VLANs to different LAN segments without changing the IP address of hosts or bouncing the switch port. This provides physical isolation while maintaining firewall sessions and avoiding DHCP issues. One benefit of using FortiGate NAC LAN Segments is that it allows for assignment of dynamic address objects matching NAC policy. This means that users can create firewall policies based on dynamic address objects that match the NAC policy criteria, such as device type, OS type, MAC address, etc. This simplifies firewall policy management and enhances security by applying different security profiles to different types of devices.References:https://docs.fortinet.
com/document/fortigate/7.0.0/new-features/856212/nac-lan-segments-7-0-1
https://docs.fortinet.com/document/fortigate/7.0.0/new-features/856212/nac-lan-segments-7-0-1

Loading …